다음은 이 유권자의 답변과 비교한 귀하의 답변입니다.
경제 › 경기 부양 대책
H>H 개인 답변Continue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
선거 › 입후보자의 투명성
H>H 개인 답변아니오, 공개한다면 더욱 존중하는 마음이 들겠지만 반드시 공개할 필요는 없습니다. |
범죄 › 범죄자의 투표권
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
국내 정채 › 임기 제한
H>H 개인 답변Whatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
환경 › 플라스틱 제품 금지
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 생분해성 제품을 만드는 회사들을 위한 조세 인센티브는 늘려야 합니다 |
과학 › 핵 에너지
H>H 개인 답변Yes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
외교 정책 › 군비
H>H 개인 답변Increase, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
보건 › 단일 보험자 건강보험
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
이민 › 시민권 시험
H>H 개인 답변예. 그러나 아주 기본적이고 단순한 주제만 다뤄야 합니다 |
범죄 › 교도소 과잉 수용
H>H 개인 답변No, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
경제 › 최저임금
H>H 개인 답변Yes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
경제 › 세금
H>H 개인 답변Reform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
환경 › 동물 실험
H>H 개인 답변네,하지만 화장품은 아닙니다. |
선거 › 선거자금 조달
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 노조 및 비영리 단체로부터의 기부를 허용합니다 |
사회적 › 히잡
H>H 개인 답변Yes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
사회적 › 성적소수자 입양 권리
H>H 개인 답변No, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
경제 › 법인세
H>H 개인 답변Flat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
외교 정책 › 외국 원조
H>H 개인 답변Decrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
외교 정책 › 외국 선거
H>H 개인 답변예, 그러나 전제 정치적 통치자에 의한 인권 침해로부터 국가를 보호하기 위해서입니다. |
사회적 › 트랜스젠더 운동 선수
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 선수들은 출생 증명서에 등재 된 생물학적성에 근거하여 경쟁해야합니다 |
사회적 › 낙태
H>H 개인 답변Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
다음은 인기 있는 정치적 주제에 대해 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
가장 많은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
가장 적은 중요한 순위에있는 6 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
다음은 전통적인 이념적 축에서 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. 판권 소유. 이 사이트를 사용하면 당사의 사용자 계약 및 개인 정보 보호 정책 에 동의하는 것으로 간주됩니다. iSideWith.com은 소매업체와의 제휴 파트너십의 일환으로 당사 사이트를 통해 구매한 제품에서 판매의 일부를 얻을 수 있습니다. iSideWith.com의 사전 서면 승인 없이는 이 사이트의 자료를 복제, 배포, 전송, 캐시 또는 기타 방식으로 사용할 수 없습니다.