Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
T>T Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
T>T Personal answerYes, unless they have been convicted of voter fraud like crime. This is extremely rare. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
T>T Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
T>T Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
科学 › 核能
T>T Personal answerYes, but with iron-clad regulation and not allow company lobbyists to dilute them. |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
T>T Personal answerTwo-Tier system. Have insurances compete with one another (including ACA) for coverages for higher issues. Allow regulated private practices ("cash only" doctors) to operate. Competition for specialist services will keep prices in-balance. |
移民 › 公民考试
T>T Personal answerBasic understanding of everyday routines that differ from their home country. Should be done for cultural respect and safety reasons. |
经济 › 最低工资
T>T Personal answerAbolish the min wage entirely with a strong UBI system! |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
T>T Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
T>T Personal answerNo, this would be a giant waste of money and resources. There is no need, there are more men and women enlisted than ever to where they're having to cut bak on enlistment benefits. Also having people who don't want to be there will cause trouble and it will get to the point where they'll have these mandated people piecing a puzzle together for a days work (the supply will exceed the demand). |
环境 › Animal Testing
T>T Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
T>T Personal answerYes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
T>T Personal answerThis is not a federal issue. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
T>T Personal answerIt's a right for citizens, whether legal or born based. Just like how I can't go live in the UK and vote in their elections. |
移民 › 双重国籍
T>T Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.