Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
c>c Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
c>c Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
c>c Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
c>c Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
移民 › 公民考试
c>c Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
经济 › 最低工资
c>c Personal answerNo, it should be up to the states and smaller businesses should be taken into account, since they may not be able to pay the federally mandated amount to their workers. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
c>c Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
c>c Personal answerYes, only if they follow APA guidelines of ethical conduct. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
c>c Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
经济 › 公司税
c>c Personal answerMaintain the current rate, but eliminate loopholes and make sure they pay the mandated amount. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
c>c Personal answerYes, but not new permissions on federal land and we should incentivize alternate energy resources. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
c>c Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
c>c Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
移民 › 双重国籍
c>c Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.