Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
L>L Personal answerDepends on the crime and must be disclosed. |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
L>L Personal answerIt would depend on the specific drug trafficker and what evidence there is that he has committed heinous enough crimes. |
经济 › 经济刺激
L>L Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
L>L Personal answerDoesn't matter that's a personal issues |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
L>L Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation and NOT if they were convicted of murder or violent crimes |
国内政策 › 任期限制
L>L Personal answerNo, politicians are not meant to serve for life, however people should have the right to re-elect someone if they feel that the representative is doing a good job in office. There are other ways to limit the corruption of politics. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
L>L Personal answerYes, though I do not think we need to ban them (not completely banned, just very limited and start the percentage lower and increase it gradually), but more importantly increase recycling so that way more people can recycle more often. Also provide tax incentives for companies that make products that contain more than 50% of biodegradable materials to incentive them to make biodegradable products, try to replace most of—if not all—plastic with more biodegradable material and increase consumer incentives to purchase and recycle these products. |
科学 › 核能
L>L Personal answerYes, gradually with heavy regulation while we also invest in research into better nuclear (thorium, fusion) and renewable; solar, wind, geothermal, wave. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
L>L Personal answerWhen appropriate increase... pay our troops more money ... eliminate waste and wasteful projects |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
L>L Personal answerDon't know enough to make a decision. |
移民 › 公民考试
L>L Personal answerYes, but only to a reasonable extent similar to what the average citizen is capable of. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
L>L Personal answerNo, the prison system in general should be reworked, as it currently takes advantages of its place in society to avoid constitutional law and take away the rights of citizens. Instead of releasing criminals before the end of their sentence, issue just and reasonable punishment for crimes of differing caliber and public opinion. The fact that prisons are overcrowded is proof of an ineffective judicial system. |
经济 › 税
L>L Personal answerNo! First, cut wasteful governmental spending, and then change the system to a VAT system. There should be some bright enough minds available to construct a system that is fair to all. But bottom line, from all who have been blessed with good fortune, somewhat more should be required, but definitely no 'soak the rich' should be in order. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
L>L Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
L>L Personal answerYes, but the donations should be publicly disclosed |
移民 › 技术移民
L>L Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
经济 › 公司税
L>L Personal answerRaise taxes on major multi-national corporations and financial institutions, but also utilize deductions to compel corporations to raise wages, invest in infrastructure and R&D to achieve a lower effective tax rate. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
L>L Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount of foreign aid, but we should reduce it for countries that violate human rights. |
外交政策 › 外国选举
L>L Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
L>L Personal answerIf you be come a legal citizen you should have the right to vote |
移民 › 双重国籍
L>L Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.