Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 经济刺激
H>H Personal answerContinue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
H>H Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
H>H Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
H>H Personal answerWhatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
H>H Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
科学 › 核能
H>H Personal answerYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
H>H Personal answerIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
H>H Personal answerYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
移民 › 公民考试
H>H Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
H>H Personal answerNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
经济 › 最低工资
H>H Personal answerYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
经济 › 税
H>H Personal answerReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
H>H Personal answer不 |
社会 › 死刑
H>H Personal answerYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
环境 › Animal Testing
H>H Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
H>H Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
H>H Personal answerYes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
H>H Personal answerNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
经济 › 公司税
H>H Personal answerFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
外交政策 › 外国援助
H>H Personal answerDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
外交政策 › 外国选举
H>H Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
H>H Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
H>H Personal answerNon, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
H>H Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 双重国籍
H>H Personal answerYes, but only with allied countries. |
社会 › 堕胎
H>H Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.